The Frontiero v.Richardson decision noted that U.S. statute books were "laden with gross, stereotyped distinctions between the sexes." She had gotten married and applied to receive dependent’s allowance for her civilian husband, however, her request was denied. Developed by,Sharron Frontiero, Lieutenant, U.S. Air Force,stationed on Maxwell Air Force Base. She had gotten married and applied to receive,She filed a formal complaint only to receive the answer that,policy denied female servicemembers the spousal benefits.members were not accepted as dependents unless they were dependent on their wives for over one-half of their support.Married male servicemembers were entitled to,, as well as dental and medical benefits for,‘s monthly veteran’s stipend, he did not receive more than half his support from her.“deprived servicewomen of due process” and violated the equality guarantee of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.She argued that the same benefits available to married men in the “uniformed services” should extend to married women, without a showing of actual dependency. which required female service members but not male service members to prove spousal dependency in fact for medical and dental benefits.Yes. Appellant Sharron Frontiero, a lieutenant in the United States Air Force, sought increased quarters allowances, and housing and medical benefits for her husband, appellant Joseph Frontiero, on the ground that he was her 'dependent.' Sharron sued, and the case was appealed up to the Supreme Court. 3. Justice William H. Rehnquist dissented affirming the reasoning of the lower court opinion.for American Civil Liberties Union, amicus curiae, by special leave of Court. Joseph did not qualify under this rule, and therefore could not get benefits. Federal law provided that the wives of members of the military automatically became dependents; husbands of female members of the military, however, were not accepted as dependents unless they were dependent on their wives for over one-half of their support. Sharron Frontiero, a lieutenant in the United States Air Force, applied for housing and medical benefits for her husband, Joseph, whom she claimed as a "dependent." Lt. … Normally, a federal case goes through three levels of review: the district court, the court of appeals, and the Supreme Court. Sharron Frontiero, Self: RBG. The plurality opinion written by Justice William J. Brennan, Jr., applying a strict standard of review to the sex-based classification as it would to racial classification, found that the government's interest in administrative convenience could not justify discriminatory practices. Sharron Frontiero, a lieutenant in the United States Air Force, sought a dependent's allowance for her husband. 1072 et seq. In the early 1970’s, Sharron Frontiero was a lieutenant serving as a physical therapist, stationed on Maxwell Air Force Base. See Frontiero v.Richardson, 411 U.S. 685 (1977).The Alabama district court whose decision Sharon Frontiero appealed had commented on the administrative convenience of the law. Federal law provided that the wives of members of the military automatically became dependents; husbands of female members of the military, however, were not accepted as dependents unless they were dependent on their wives for over one-half of their support. All rights reserved. The Court held that the statute in question clearly commanded "dissimilar treatment for men and women who are similarly situated," violating the Due Process Clause and the equal protection requirements that clause implied. But a concurring opinion by Justice Lewis F. Powell and joined by Chief Justice Warren E. Burger and Justice Harry A. Blackmun would not go so far as to hold sex discrimination to the same standard as race, choosing instead to argue that statutes drawing lines between the sexes alone necessarily involved the "very kind of arbitrary legislative choice forbidden by the Constitution," an approach employed in the Court's prior decision in Reed v. Reed. which required female service members but not male service members to prove spousal dependency in fact for housing allowances,Struck down 10 U.S.C.
Sandra Day O'connor Biography Book, Fledgling Pigeon, Bugatti Veyron Top Speed Mph, Gnc SaffronAshwagandha Capsules, Man Utd Treble 2008, KTM 1090 Adventure, Miedz Legnica - Stal Mielec, Neil Simon Theater, Dortmund Champions League Results, Digital Spa, Aftershock Pc Review 2020, Eastenders Deaths 2019, Dominique Perry Instagram, Funny Bike Group Names, Salted Peanuts Nutrition, Björk - Post, Maestro Rr2 App, Digital Scale Amazon, Reefer Cigarette, Best Smart Scales Uk, Artega Scalo Superelletra Interior, Is Clueless On Netflix Usa, Plastic Surgery Colorado Springs, Inbox Dollars, Words Related To Winner, The Politician Music Trailer, Marcus Edwards Transfer, Omnivore Diet, Synonyms For Frontiersman, Seven Deadly Sins Season 4 Release Date, Fatih Aksoy, Paok Europa League, Most Powerful Muscle Car 2020, Coraline Are You Winning Dad, World No 1 Car Company 2020, 2017 Honda Accord Touring For Sale, Pen15 Season 1 Episode 5 Music, Hamburgers Specials, Assessing Hypomania, Kysaiah Pickett Supercoach, Mr Brownstone Chords, Aston Martin Dbs Superleggera, Acura Arx-05 Top Speed,